<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Resolving Conflicting Research Results: Vaccine Education is Tricky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://icbseverywhere.com/blog/2015/08/resolving-conflicting-research-results-vaccine-education-is-tricky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://icbseverywhere.com/blog/2015/08/resolving-conflicting-research-results-vaccine-education-is-tricky/</link>
	<description>Knowledge, science, reason, education, philosophy, behavior, politics, religion, and B.S.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 03:28:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Drescher</title>
		<link>http://icbseverywhere.com/blog/2015/08/resolving-conflicting-research-results-vaccine-education-is-tricky/comment-page-1/#comment-62322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barbara Drescher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 23:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://icbseverywhere.com/blog/?p=2074#comment-62322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I greatly appreciate the link to your data, although I have no real concerns about your findings. As I noted, I think the research was well-design and I have no serious criticisms (which, as anyone who reads the blog will attest, is a huge compliment) of the research itself. 

And, yes, this wasn&#039;t meant to be a thorough discussion of method, just a quick overview to show laypersons how the findings of two studies can appear to contradict each other even when neither is badly flawed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I greatly appreciate the link to your data, although I have no real concerns about your findings. As I noted, I think the research was well-design and I have no serious criticisms (which, as anyone who reads the blog will attest, is a huge compliment) of the research itself. </p>
<p>And, yes, this wasn&#8217;t meant to be a thorough discussion of method, just a quick overview to show laypersons how the findings of two studies can appear to contradict each other even when neither is badly flawed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Horne</title>
		<link>http://icbseverywhere.com/blog/2015/08/resolving-conflicting-research-results-vaccine-education-is-tricky/comment-page-1/#comment-62315</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Horne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 02:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://icbseverywhere.com/blog/?p=2074#comment-62315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I enjoyed your blog post. I think you raise some important points about how to interpret our results and Nyhan&#039;s results. I do feel that other experimental issues, which are slightly more subtle, were glossed over in this overview. However, I understand that you cannot necessarily get into the nitty-gritty in such a post. 

If you have question-level concerns about our findings, I&#039;d encourage you to check out the data here https://osf.io/nx364/

-Zach Horne]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed your blog post. I think you raise some important points about how to interpret our results and Nyhan&#8217;s results. I do feel that other experimental issues, which are slightly more subtle, were glossed over in this overview. However, I understand that you cannot necessarily get into the nitty-gritty in such a post. </p>
<p>If you have question-level concerns about our findings, I&#8217;d encourage you to check out the data here <a href="https://osf.io/nx364/" rel="nofollow">https://osf.io/nx364/</a></p>
<p>-Zach Horne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
