<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Polarizing Nature of Skepticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://icbseverywhere.com/blog/2010/06/the-polarizing-nature-of-skepticism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://icbseverywhere.com/blog/2010/06/the-polarizing-nature-of-skepticism/</link>
	<description>Knowledge, science, reason, education, philosophy, behavior, politics, religion, and B.S.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 03:28:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://icbseverywhere.com/blog/2010/06/the-polarizing-nature-of-skepticism/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 02:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://icbseverywhere.com/blog/?p=698#comment-94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wouldn&#039;t retract your hate. These people are despicable. Just blame them for what they&#039;ve done, not what they haven&#039;t done.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t retract your hate. These people are despicable. Just blame them for what they&#8217;ve done, not what they haven&#8217;t done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CopperJP</title>
		<link>http://icbseverywhere.com/blog/2010/06/the-polarizing-nature-of-skepticism/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CopperJP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 02:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://icbseverywhere.com/blog/?p=698#comment-93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m guilty, in this exact case.  Thanks for doing the research and pointing out the lack of evidence in our arguments.  Guess I better go retract my hate...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guilty, in this exact case.  Thanks for doing the research and pointing out the lack of evidence in our arguments.  Guess I better go retract my hate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seantheblogonaut</title>
		<link>http://icbseverywhere.com/blog/2010/06/the-polarizing-nature-of-skepticism/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seantheblogonaut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 04:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://icbseverywhere.com/blog/?p=698#comment-60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;my&quot; obviously - should pause before hitting send :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;my&#8221; obviously &#8211; should pause before hitting send <img src="http://icbseverywhere.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/simple-smile.png" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seantheblogonaut</title>
		<link>http://icbseverywhere.com/blog/2010/06/the-polarizing-nature-of-skepticism/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seantheblogonaut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 04:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://icbseverywhere.com/blog/?p=698#comment-59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the anti-vaxx lobby does enough foot-bulleting for us to comment on that we don&#039;t need to resort to taking &quot;opportunities&quot;-  especially when it results in poorly formed arguments and conflating facts surrounding the issue.

It would have been far better to use this as an time to point out the need for boosters, for basic healthcare, to educate us on the facts surrounding whooping cough. 

All me family had been at one time or another vaccinated against it.  But owing to either a lack of understanding/knowledge both my sister and I contracted it in our teens and my mother has just recently had it.

I wonder what information people walked away from Phil&#039;d post with?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the anti-vaxx lobby does enough foot-bulleting for us to comment on that we don&#8217;t need to resort to taking &#8220;opportunities&#8221;-  especially when it results in poorly formed arguments and conflating facts surrounding the issue.</p>
<p>It would have been far better to use this as an time to point out the need for boosters, for basic healthcare, to educate us on the facts surrounding whooping cough. </p>
<p>All me family had been at one time or another vaccinated against it.  But owing to either a lack of understanding/knowledge both my sister and I contracted it in our teens and my mother has just recently had it.</p>
<p>I wonder what information people walked away from Phil&#8217;d post with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Armchair Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://icbseverywhere.com/blog/2010/06/the-polarizing-nature-of-skepticism/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Armchair Skeptic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://icbseverywhere.com/blog/?p=698#comment-58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post.   I don&#039;t have a problem with skeptics being fallible and succumbing to irrational thinking as humans have a tendency to do... as long as they are open to having that pointed out to them.  When they aren&#039;t, I have to wonder how skeptical they really are, and I usually recommend they read Carol Tavris&#039;s &quot;Mistakes were made (but not by me)&quot;.

On the broader level, I would hate to see the skeptical movement (if that&#039;s what it is) become just like any other movement -- where joiners pile on, just looking to be part of *some* movement, and where less-than-honorable but charismatic leaders can ride that wave to fame, fortune, glory, or whatever drives their egos -- at the expense of reason, facts, and often, ethics.

People often complain that organizing skeptics is like herding cats, but I think that&#039;s as it should be.  The point of what we&#039;re doing is to get people to think for themselves and keep it real.  Steamrolling over reality for the sake of a cause isn&#039;t being skeptical.  And if that means skepticism remains a minority view, and is generally disliked, so be it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.   I don&#8217;t have a problem with skeptics being fallible and succumbing to irrational thinking as humans have a tendency to do&#8230; as long as they are open to having that pointed out to them.  When they aren&#8217;t, I have to wonder how skeptical they really are, and I usually recommend they read Carol Tavris&#8217;s &#8220;Mistakes were made (but not by me)&#8221;.</p>
<p>On the broader level, I would hate to see the skeptical movement (if that&#8217;s what it is) become just like any other movement &#8212; where joiners pile on, just looking to be part of *some* movement, and where less-than-honorable but charismatic leaders can ride that wave to fame, fortune, glory, or whatever drives their egos &#8212; at the expense of reason, facts, and often, ethics.</p>
<p>People often complain that organizing skeptics is like herding cats, but I think that&#8217;s as it should be.  The point of what we&#8217;re doing is to get people to think for themselves and keep it real.  Steamrolling over reality for the sake of a cause isn&#8217;t being skeptical.  And if that means skepticism remains a minority view, and is generally disliked, so be it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geepetes</title>
		<link>http://icbseverywhere.com/blog/2010/06/the-polarizing-nature-of-skepticism/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geepetes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://icbseverywhere.com/blog/?p=698#comment-56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Skeptics can be passionate about the stupidity, but I agree we need also to remind ourselves to examine issues fairly and recognize when evidence or information is unclear or not clearly relevant.  Skepticism, as a movement or position, is just as vulnerable to irrational ranting as any other.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skeptics can be passionate about the stupidity, but I agree we need also to remind ourselves to examine issues fairly and recognize when evidence or information is unclear or not clearly relevant.  Skepticism, as a movement or position, is just as vulnerable to irrational ranting as any other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
